Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VACUUM\s+PLATING\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VACUUM\s+PLATING\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. VACUUM PLATING (score: 1): Author: "kd 423" <kd423@h...>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:39:39 -0600; I've had several emails tonight. I wanted to clarify something regarding this process. It is a vacuum plating process, not a painting process. It must be performed with specialized equipment. The pro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00259.html (7,656 bytes)
2. Re: Vacuum Plating (score: 1): Author: Denny Anspach <danspach@m...>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:07:50 -0800; The comments that "chrome" is for the most part too bright for "stainless steel" is pretty much right on. In this regard (although not perfect), "nickel" is a better finish. My question: can nickel b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00297.html (6,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]