Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Signal\s+at\s+MP\s+9\.57\s+\(Was\s+\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Triple\s+Track\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:31:29 -0800
Steve: I believe you (as the dispatcher) had control of this WB Main 1 signal, did you not? There were also WB signals on Mains 2 and 3 on the 3-track signal bridge at MP 9.31. My recollection was th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00156.html (15,092 bytes)

2. Re: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Glen See previous post. Then there is the newer Fish Tower. But Gary is more then likely the only one who knows about it Dispatcher control of that signal has changed over the years Steve in SC Steve
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00162.html (15,599 bytes)

3. Re: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:26:46 -0600
Speaking of MP and the Triple Track, does anyone have better diagrams/drawings of the Chicago and Aurora Divisions.... the ones I have do not indicate the MPs except at odd locations and are somewhat
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00171.html (12,776 bytes)

4. RE: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:38:42 -0600
I have 2 different Track Diagram books (different issue dates) showing C&A Div; can bring to BRHS Batavia meet if you like Charlie Gerald Speaking of MP and the Triple Track, does anyone have better
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00172.html (13,450 bytes)

5. Re: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:10:16 -0600
GeraldThat would be very helpful. I'll bring my laptop with a scanner. Mine were bad copies to begin with and have faded over the years. Charlie -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00173.html (14,101 bytes)

6. RE: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:41:35 -0600
Mine are both originals - one came from Mgr @ Aurora and other I cannot recall the fellow's position with the Q but ex. condition. I have books for all mainlines See ya @ Batavia - heard anything as
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00175.html (14,879 bytes)

7. Re: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Charlie I found the list of the DeGoyler collection at SMU Will bring to Batavia Steve in SC GeraldThat would be very helpful. I'll bring my laptop with a scanner. Mine were bad copies to begin with
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00176.html (14,511 bytes)

8. Re: Signal at MP 9.57 (Was [CBQ] Re: Triple Track) (score: 1)
Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:54:34 -0600
SteveExcellent!! Thanks, Charlie Charlie I found the list of the DeGoyler collection at SMU Will bring to Batavia Steve in SC GeraldThat would be very helpful. I'll bring my laptop with a scanner. Mi
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00177.html (14,508 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu