Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\:\s+unit\s+grain\s+trains\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+Large\s+Cubic\s+Foot\s+Covered\s+Hoppers\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "jeff worones jworones@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
Now for a covered hopper question: I also have not seen many photos of the larger grain covered hoppers on the C&I in the late 1960's. The few CB&Q wheel reports I have do show quite a number of HC-
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00077.html (18,292 bytes)

2. Re: Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:06:54 -0500
Digging up an old post here... I always found it interesting that the Q was late to the party regarding unit grain trains. A leader in the unit coal train scene, but not grain. By the mid-1960s, the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00079.html (19,530 bytes)

3. Re: Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "'Douglas Harding' doug.harding@iowacentralrr.org [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:08:13 -0500
Jeff it may have been because the Q&#8217;s branch lines were not located in areas with heavy grain production. At least Southern Iowa was not the grain producer like northern Iowa, where the RI and
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00080.html (12,869 bytes)

4. Re: Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:06:27 +0000 (UTC)
Jeff it may have been because the Qs branch lines were not located in areas with heavy grain production. At least Southern Iowa was not the grain producer like northern Iowa, where the RI and CNW pr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00083.html (15,029 bytes)

5. Re: Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:27:40 -0400
Believe it or not the Rock Island was one of the "Pioneers"..if not actually the first to introduce the concept of Unit Trains.. Shortly after the Langdon regime took over the traffic department was
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00085.html (16,216 bytes)

6. Re: Is: unit grain trains was: Re: [CBQ] CB&Q Large Cubic Foot Covered Hoppers (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Metcalf normmetcalf@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Believe it or not the Rock Island was one of the "Pioneers"..if not actually the first to introduce the concept of Unit Trains.. Shortly after the Langdon regime took over the traffic department was
/archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00086.html (19,054 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu