Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Baldwin\s+Switchers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Baldwin\s+Switchers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Baldwin Switchers (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@a...>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:56:47 -0600; The discussions regarding the new Stewart models made me remember an article - and I have finally located it. In the Second Quarter 1945 volume of the Baldwin magazine (published by, guess who? Baldw; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-03/msg00552.html (6,992 bytes)
2. Baldwin Switchers (score: 1): Author: <sdoyle19@i...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:43:12 -0500; Can anyone confirm the length of the Baldwin S-12 (coupler to coupler). I know the Baldwin VO-1000 was a little over 48', and the early versions had a slightly pointed nose. Was the basic body of the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00257.html (6,457 bytes)
3. re: Baldwin Switchers (score: 1): Author: "Virginia Edgar" <vje68@h...>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:20:48 -0500; Per my 1940's Q loco diagram book (figure it would be more accurate than the late 50's version!) the Alco's were 45'-5&3'4" over coupler faces with a 41'-6" frame length - the Baldwins were 48'-10" o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-08/msg00259.html (6,856 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]