Hi all, I was wondering how long a trip from NYC to Billings, Montana would probably have taken in 1934. Not sure which route they took from NYC to Chicago, but definitely the Burlington from there t
Burlington all the way from Chicago to Billings? Or Burlington to St. Paul and then NP to Billings? That would have been the logical routing. NP's NCL took roughly 38 hours between Chicago and Bil
looking at my Burlington 1934 TT, I show the following: Depart Chgo at 10:30 AM on the Aristocrat Arrive Denver 7:00 AM the next morning 1034 miles Dept Denver 7:45 PM on train 29 Arrive Billings 6:0
_._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#63479) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O
-- Emanuel Tschopp Centrum für Naturkunde Universität Hamburg Germany skype: eme_aufm_faarrad _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#63496) | Rep
Possibly changing to trains 41 or 43 in Lincoln, the trip was shorter. But I'm seeing the 1937 and 1940 timetables. Regards, Mario De: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> en nombre de Emanuel Tschopp <tsch
From a 1940 timetable. De: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> en nombre de mmar_62 <mmar62@hotmail.com> Enviado: domingo, 10 de abril de 2022 10:06 Para: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> Asunto: Re: [CBQ] tr
East of Chicago, I think it would make sense to take the PRR since they shared Union Station with CB&Q. West of Chicago, wouldn't a through CB&Q/NP train be a lot faster and more direct? Landon From:
Attached are scans of the TT I used, Oct 1934 - I also have the May 1934 TT which shows the same routing. I realized that I gave some incorrect information. The Chicago to Denver run arrived in Denve