Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+re\:\s+final\s+correction\s+B\&MR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+re\:\s+final\s+correction\s+B\&MR\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] re: final correction B&MR (score: 1): Author: "gaedgar66" <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:40:38 -0600; I'll meet 15/16 of the way Dave! I've been trying to think why my brain shorted out to CB&Q rather than B&MR on the cons't of trackage from Burlington westerly. Then while rereading Overton & Baldwin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-03/msg00078.html (9,682 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] re: final correction B&MR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:16:59 -0600; As you all can tell, I?m a detail person and the CB&Q didn?t exist as a corporation until February 14, 1855! Trains didn?t operate to East Burlington until March 17, 1855, and then they were CB&Q tra; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-03/msg00081.html (8,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]