Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+re\:\s+Pool\s+Power\s+with\s+GN\s+and\s+NP\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+re\:\s+Pool\s+Power\s+with\s+GN\s+and\s+NP\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Pool Power with GN and NP on the Q (score: 1): Author: Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:14:50 -0700 (PDT); Re: Pool Power with GN and NP on the Q. Im unaware of a power "pool" with NP. The GN scrap that handled #88 into Clyde and #97 out of Clyde was running off "equalization" miles to offset the mileage; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00009.html (12,033 bytes)
2. [CBQ] re: Pool Power with GN and NP on the Q (score: 1): Author: ANDREW KOETZ <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:09:44 -0500; Pool Power with GN & NP Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:28 pm (PDT) When the Q pooled power together with GN & NP diesels would you have to have the Q on the point or could the other roads motors take the lead on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00353.html (12,402 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]