Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+computers\s+and\s+RRs\;\s+was\:\s+appropriate\s+postings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+computers\s+and\s+RRs\;\s+was\:\s+appropriate\s+postings\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] computers and RRs; was: appropriate postings (score: 1): Author: jeff worones <jworones@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT); The talk of computers made me think of some recent reading... During the mid 1970s the RI made a big deal about getting two new computers with a massive storage amount of 750 bytes each. Hard to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-10/msg00161.html (10,113 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] computers and RRs; was: appropriate postings (score: 1): Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT); Can't store a lot with only 750 bytes of storage. I think that only assembler programs could be stored. I know that my Fortran programs were a lot more than 750 bytes in the early 1970s (I believ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-10/msg00162.html (11,890 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]