Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Why\s+Wyoming\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Why\s+Wyoming\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Why Wyoming (score: 1): Author: "bkobielusz" <bkobielusz@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:59:53 -0600; Hi All Does anyone know the reason fo the 2 CB&Q runs up through Wyoming. Was it merely a connection for parent Company Norther Pacific in Montana? Where they trying to generate trackside business or; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00146.html (9,505 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Why Wyoming (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:29:57 -0800 (PST); It's only a guess, connection w/NP but also Yellowstone Park. The Q was not a land grant railroad like the NP & IC among others. Land grants were not all that good like everybody thinks. The IC got a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00150.html (10,448 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Why Wyoming (score: 1): Author: "harold huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:41:31 -0700; Brad, Simply, the Q was trying to reach Yellowstone and all that passenger traffic. They first went from Alliance to Sheridan to Billings For a while they had a cut off from Tuloca, MT to Cody, but a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00151.html (11,402 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Why Wyoming (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:47:11 -0800; While the Burlington was not primarily built with land grants there were areas where they did get land grants. Some of that may have been from RR's the CB&Q bought, but it still applied to them. See:; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00152.html (10,465 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]