Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Waycars\s+In\s+Interchange\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Waycar\s+underframes$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Waycars\s+In\s+Interchange\s+$was\s+Re\:\s+Waycar\s+underframes$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Waycars In Interchange (was Re: Waycar underframes) (score: 1): Author: "Paul K." <kozys@insightbb.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:46:33 -0500; ```````` This is the first I've ever heard about waycars in interchange. Could someone elaborate on this practice? Thanks. =|==|= "Paul (Kossart) - The CB&Q Guy" =|==|= North Central IL, *USA* =|==|=; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-09/msg00147.html (10,104 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Waycars In Interchange (was Re: Waycar underframes) (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:28:09 -0500; Paul, A couple of factors here: When they were finally willing to practice the concept that trains did not need to be yarded and torn apart at interchange points, (in the case of the CB&Q about 20 ye; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-09/msg00148.html (12,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]