Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+TR2\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+TR2\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] TR2 Question (score: 1): Author: "herrick01" <herrick@krausonline.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:50:35 -0600; In volume four of his series, Mike Spoor says 69/64 (Tri City Msde) between Chicago and the Quad Cities was powered by a TR2 cow and calf set until 1954 when replaced by GP's. Were the TR2's bidirect; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00191.html (10,000 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] TR2 Question (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:50:21 -0500; Bob, Would suppose that the attitude would be up to the engineer. I do not think it was turned on the Fox River. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00192.html (10,792 bytes)
3. [CBQ] TR2 Question (score: 1): Author: "herrick01" <herrick@krausonline.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:04:54 -0600; Were the original TR2 cow and calf units, i.e. when permanently coupled and before the cab was added to the B unit, "bidirectional" or did they require turning when used in heavy transfer work or roa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00145.html (9,715 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]