Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+T2\'s\s+2\-6\-6\-2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+T2\'s\s+2\-6\-6\-2\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: "Ray Bedard" <tczephyr@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:47:29 -0800; Recently, I have been looking at the Mantua 2-6-6-2's on ebay (ho SCALE). T2's with some modifications. I wonder if anyone on the list has attempted to do this, and if so what your thoughts are. The; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00239.html (10,644 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@cwia.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:18:14 -0800 (PST); Ray, They weren't Q T-1's. PFM brought in some GN L-1's of which three became the first T-1's. I believe they were Crown models and when they came in they were around $1,000 and that sure wasn't chea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00242.html (9,067 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: railbass@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:46:41 +0000; We had one modeler here in Colorado who kitbashed a Mantua 2-6-6-2 to an On30 model of a Uintah articulated. The same could be done for Sumpter Valley and other narrow gauge logging roads. I have a M; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00243.html (10,216 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:23:28 -0500; Not much similarity between the two. The Mantua has 50 inch drivers, the CB&Qs had (I think) 64 inch drivers. Bob Yarger, Editor Railway Preservation News (free website) www.rypn.org -- Original Mess; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00249.html (11,197 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:03:10 EST; Ray, The Q T2's were ordered by the GN, when they were built the GN told the Q you have new engines..... Loren Johnson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00250.html (8,576 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:13:47 -0600; LorenI think you meant the T1s..... the T2s were designed to Q standards... essentially two R4s with a long boiler. The T1s were GN designs diverted to the Q. There was some use of the Q engineering; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00252.html (9,509 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] T2's 2-6-6-2 (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 03:14:02 EST; Opps Charlie, you're right... LOL [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers. At Network for Good, hel; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-03/msg00254.html (8,518 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]