Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Signal\s+Bridges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Signal\s+Bridges\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Signal Bridges (score: 1): Author: <sdoyle19@idt.net>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:24:15 -0500; Hi, Can anyone tell me what the suggested or minimum clearance was for CB&Q signal bridges? Thanks. Steve [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Make a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00131.html (8,295 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Signal Bridges (score: 1): Author: Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@rickadee.net>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:24:40 -0700 (PDT); Steve, there is a copy of Q standard clearance diagram from 1920 on the BRHS website at: http://www.burlingtonroute.com/gallery/Miscellaneous?page=3 Best regards, Randy -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00135.html (9,098 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Signal Bridges (score: 1): Author: "GLEN HAUG" <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 23:02:52 -0700; Steve: The answer depends on the signal bridge. Most of the signal bridges installed from 1913 on were built with about 24' clearance. Some of the earliest "lattice" truss or "triangular" truss signa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00141.html (9,126 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Signal Bridges (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:49:10 -0500; Steve, Another factor here is what State it was in. For some reason the States have seen fit to regulate overhead clearance. Thus the Railroad's standards vary from State to State. Steve: The answer; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-05/msg00145.html (9,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]