Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:LCL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:LCL\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re:LCL (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <Ed@pixelspublishing.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:34:08 -0600; Leo and Others: I suspect that the oranges were not shipped as lcl (Less-ThanCarload) freight, but as express. The Railway Express Agency reserved space similar to the Post Office Department for stor; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00233.html (9,756 bytes)
2. Fwd: [CBQ] Re:LCL (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:46:22 EST; Ed, Sounds like another fine example of your work is coming. Thanks, for the briefing. Leo [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00235.html (8,841 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re:LCL (score: 1): Author: "rrhistorian" <rrhistorian@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:36:58 -0600; What would be a good source to check for details on LCL discontinuation? Did railroads have to file a notice with the ICC that they were discontinuing a particular tarriff? If so, where would these d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-02/msg00238.html (9,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]