Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+XM21\s+to\s+XM23\s+boxcars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+XM21\s+to\s+XM23\s+boxcars\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: XM21 to XM23 boxcars (score: 1): Author: "Benjamin Scanlon" <benjaminscanlon@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 05:55:01 -0600; hi does anyone know what it was that gave XM22 boxcar 131406 in this photo a 'low slung appearance'? http://www.trainlife.com/magazines/pages/144/10395/february-1993-page-21 the caption looks as thou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00080.html (11,845 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: XM21 to XM23 boxcars (score: 1): Author: Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 21:26:54 -0400; Ben It's not slung low, but the diagonals are attached at the bottom to the crossbearers, and it has a long straight side sill for strength. If you look at many other box car photos they may have dee; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-10/msg00084.html (11,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]