- 1. Re: [CBQ] Re: Thoughts on FRED Working under a flag (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:26:30 EST
- It means working under an assumed name. In the days prior to Social Security Numbers and any other reliable means to check on a person's true identity a railroad employee would assume a name other th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00297.html (11,293 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Thoughts on FRED Working under a flag (score: 1)
- Author: cttnghmrl@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:18:38 EST
- Well, I'm not Leo, but I think I know the answer to your question. The paper used for the letter had one of two different water marks which indicated "yes" or "no." I have an old book titled "Railroa
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00306.html (10,218 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Thoughts on FRED Working under a flag (score: 1)
- Author: "Archie" <kliner@mywdo.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:50:19 -0600
- It means working under an assumed name. In the days prior to Social Security Numbers and any other reliable means to check on a person's true identity a railroad employee would assume a name other th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00321.html (11,966 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Thoughts on FRED Working under a flag (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:27:26 EST
- Yes Archie it did...you're right, but you're not first, so you get a consolation prize of equal value with the first prize. Pete [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Li
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2007-01/msg00322.html (9,472 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu