- 1. [CBQ] Re: SP trackage rights (score: 1)
- Author: "James Vivian" <jvivian765@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:55:02 -0600
- work for products? In summer '94 I have a shot of an eastbound tied down on the main at Earlville and it looked to be drag freight. being? -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00126.html (11,838 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: SP trackage rights (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Nadolski" <pnadolski2719@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:55:02 -0600
- While I don't know for sure when SP/UP started running over the CB&Q/BN to Chicago, I do know that SP handed a lot of traffic to the Soo Line at Kansas City in the late 80s, which was hauled to Chica
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00129.html (11,869 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: SP trackage rights (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Schattl" <mike@schattl.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:11:18 -0500
- I filmed an eastbound SP coal train at Spaulding before the trackage rights deal. It was pulled by four DRGW tunnel motors. Here's the LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pv4iFDKoec&feature=plcp M
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00131.html (14,067 bytes)
- 4. [CBQ] Re: SP trackage rights (score: 1)
- Author: "James Vivian" <jvivian765@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:55:02 -0600
- rights deal. CB&Q/BN to Chicago, I do know that SP handed a lot of traffic to the Soo Line at Kansas City in the late 80s, which was hauled to Chicago on the ex-MILW Kansas City line. I saw a LOT of
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00133.html (12,880 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Re: SP trackage rights (score: 1)
- Author: "fhc925@frontier.com" <fhc925@frontier.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
- While I don't know for sure when SP/UP started running over the CB&Q/BN to Chicago, I do know that SP handed a lot of traffic to the Soo Line at Kansas City in the late 80s, which was hauled to Chic
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00135.html (16,464 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu