Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Proposed\s+but\s+never\s+built\s+CB\&Q\s+steam\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Proposed\s+but\s+never\s+built\s+CB\&Q\s+steam\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1): Author: "William Barber clipperw@gmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:03:27 -0500; Re: Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? "Charlie Vlk" n_cbqguy Mon Oct 5, 2015 11:15 am (PDT) . Posted by: Charlie, The first Milwaukee Road F-6 and F-6A class hudsons were contemporaries of the Q S; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00038.html (19,396 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1): Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:40:39 -0500; Bill- I believe you and Hol are right on target. The Q Hudsons are beefed up versions of the USRA Heavy Pacific (only built for the ERIE). The Q was great for building on existing designs that worked; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00043.html (15,246 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1): Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:59:31 +0000 (UTC); Bill- I believe you and Hol are right on target. The Q Hudsons are beefed up versions of the USRA Heavy Pacific (only built for the ERIE). The Q was great for building on existing designs that worke; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00056.html (16,244 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]