Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Nebraska\s+cement\s+plants\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Nebraska\s+cement\s+plants\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Nebraska cement plants (score: 1): Author: Richard Kistler <rckistler@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:56:19 -0600; Re Nebraska Cement Plants - Norm - there only two, here and Louisville, the latter is still going, while the one here in Superior has been gone for several years. The cement plant here went through s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00103.html (10,773 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Nebraska cement plants (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:33:02 -0600; Richard, It is interesting that you indicate that the cement plant in Superior has been gone for several years. If you look at the current Google satellite view of Superior, what appears to be a ceme; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00111.html (10,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]