- 1. [CBQ] Re: HO Model of the Aeolus (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:04:12 -0500
- Noel, Actually, the shrouding for the two locomotives was not identical. There were subtle differences, primarily due to the equipment under the shroud. The main differences were the headlight and ex
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00356.html (10,835 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Re: HO Model of the Aeolus (score: 1)
- Author: Noel <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:49:29 -0400
- Noel, Actually, the shrouding for the two locomotives was not identical. There were subtle differences, primarily due to the equipment under the shroud. The main differences were the headlight and ex
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00360.html (12,787 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: HO Model of the Aeolus (score: 1)
- Author: Noel <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:19:27 -0400
- Noel, Actually, the shrouding for the two locomotives was not identical. There were subtle differences, primarily due to the equipment under the shroud. The main differences were the headlight and ex
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-03/msg00368.html (12,805 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu