Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+GP9\s+280\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+GP9\s+280\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: GP9 280 (score: 1): Author: "Tim" <twells1983@kellogg.northwestern.edu>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:55:01 -0600; Hi Colin - The photos I have of 280 in red are post BN-merger and the unit did not have stripes all the way around the nose (i.e. the flat panel was red). I have seen a few red units with the stripes; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00296.html (12,081 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: GP9 280 (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:01:57 -0600; Here's a photo of GP7 223 as BN 1579 but still in Q paint: http://flic.kr/p/dMd8Km Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis Downers Grove IL You can see my railroad photography blog at http://www.chasinghea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00297.html (13,139 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: GP9 280 (score: 1): Author: "cms_inv_2001" <colin.s@virgin.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:55:01 -0600; Hi Tim and Bryan That's great, thanks for the confirmation on the paint work. I found a photo online of the 283 which confirmed that the flat panel did not have the stripes either, I was just going t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00300.html (10,273 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: GP9 280 (score: 1): Author: "cms_inv_2001" <colin.s@virgin.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:55:01 -0600; Thanks Michael Colin Stewart -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-01/msg00301.html (9,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]