Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+GN\s+power\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s+\[1\s+Attachment\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+GN\s+power\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s+\[1\s+Attachment\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: GN power on the Q [1 Attachment] (score: 1): Author: Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 06:24:28 -0700 (PDT); [Attachment(s) from Karl Rethwisch included below] Ahhh, 97 !!! What memories !! Bill's shot is from the pre-merger days of 97 and 88 when GN "power" was being used as the mileage equalization units; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00019.html (13,093 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: GN power on the Q [1 Attachment] (score: 1): Author: Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 09:10:22 -0700 (PDT); [Attachment(s) from Karl Rethwisch included below] While it's possible that GN or NP units could have operated on the "Main Line" (2nd' Sub.), I do not recall ever seing any doing so. As mentioned, M; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00038.html (12,995 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]