Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+E\s+Unit\s+\&\s+F\s+Unit\s+Paint\s+Schemes\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+E\s+Unit\s+\&\s+F\s+Unit\s+Paint\s+Schemes\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: E Unit & F Unit Paint Schemes? (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Harris" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:55:01 -0600; The issue to me isn't whether they "should" have changed from black stripes to red on their E units. It was a minor detail that formed a small part of a larger change in corporate aesthetics which in; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00062.html (14,074 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Re: E Unit & F Unit Paint Schemes? (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:01:37 -0700; The repainting of depots into white with no separate color for trim began in 1955 or even the year before, well prior to the 1959 adoption of the new image paint schemes for diesels. It was done pure; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00063.html (18,789 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Re: E Unit & F Unit Paint Schemes? (score: 1): Author: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:08:02 -0700; Sorry about all the typos that got through in the message below. The only really major one is in the third paragraph and should relate that the nose ornamentation on the freight F's was a stylized PA; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00064.html (19,586 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: E Unit & F Unit Paint Schemes? (score: 1): Author: "smokyjoe66" <js08ws62@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:55:02 -0600; I agree. The Black was elegant. The Red looked frivolous ... just a passing fancy.. It wasn't broke, so why fix it ? ~ John A. Swearingen -- -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00066.html (12,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]