Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Chapin\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Chapin\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "Bob Weber" <eng95@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:53:09 -0700; The CB&Q did a lot of interchange traffic with the Wabash at Chapin, Il. The Wabash main line was Kansas City to Buffalo. Here is their route map. http://wabashrhs.org/images/wabsysmap.jpg Bob Weber; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00005.html (11,773 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:02:34 -0400; Thanks for all the responses. So, would anyone like to hazard a guess concerning the route the car would take to get to Chapin via the Q? Down to St. Louis, then north up towards Beardstown? Or north; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00007.html (13,970 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:50:01 -0700 (PDT); The Keokuk branch was very light rail and slow speed and had some very lightly rated bridges. -- On Sat, 11/3/12, Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca> wrote: From: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympat; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00008.html (14,562 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:19:56 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for all the responses. So, would anyone like to hazard a guess concerning the route the car would take to get to Chapin via the Q? Down to St. Louis, then north up towards Beardstown? Or nort; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00009.html (16,367 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:51:03 -0700 (PDT); The old saying was, "Don't short haul yourself" i.e. keep the load on your own railroad as far as possible. Of course, the shipper had an absolute right to specify the route and sophisticated shipper; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00010.html (17,234 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "fhc925@frontier.com" <fhc925@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 04:46:42 -0800 (PST); The old saying was, "Don't short haul yourself" i.e. keep the load on your own railroad as far as possible. Of course, the shipper had an absolute right to specify the route and sophisticated shippe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00011.html (20,662 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 06:56:41 -0600; The old saying was, "Don't short haul yourself" i.e. keep the load on your own railroad as far as possible. Of course, the shipper had an absolute right to specify the route and sophisticated shippe; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00012.html (21,798 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 07:01:07 -0800 (PST); Guys: Another aspect of routing has to do with who owned the shipment and who was paying the freight bill. If the shipment (the contents) was payed for at origin the receiver could route the car as; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00013.html (23,957 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:28:19 -0500; Steve, Would the CB&Q prefer the shorter route via Quincy or the longer route via Burlington? Would there be a financial incentive to use one or the other? Duncan -- Original Message -- From: sholdin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00017.html (17,922 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:29:42 -0500; John, so if the CB&Q was handing traffic over to the Rock, or Wabash or TP&W at Keokuk, it would likely have been because the shipper had specified that routing? Duncan -- Original Message -- From: c; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00018.html (19,716 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:33:05 -0800 (PST); The tariff rate was determined by the shortest route on that railroad. so no, there was no finacial incentive to send it the long way around, however there might be operational reasons. -- On Sun, 11; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00019.html (18,112 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:35:51 -0800 (PST); Yes, indeed. It usually wasn't for a cheaper rate but for better service. This where a local agent earned his keep' -- On Sun, 11/4/12, Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca> wrote: From: Duncan Cam; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00020.html (19,022 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]