Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Burlington\s+Locomotives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Burlington\s+Locomotives\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "Tim VanMersbergen" <killercarp@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:16:10 -0600; In passenger service they may have figured it out quickly, but in freight operations, they never did. It is ironic that almost none all the freight cab units had nose MU connections, so the freight d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00065.html (11,565 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Locomotives (score: 1): Author: "East Pass" <EastPass@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:57:39 -0600; Tim, Don't understand you statement. Until the arrival of the SD24's the F units would have to be in the lead anyway. At that point they had already started to be traded in so no reason to modify. F; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00094.html (11,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]