Mark, Thanks for offering to upload the information for all to see. I'm all in favor of having the opportunity to see it. Later, Dave S. Tucson, AZ -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on t
Amen. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to:
Mark, This is a great article. Thanks for getting it posted for us. Later, Dave S. Tucson, AZ -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*>
Folks, It would be nice to see, but I do not want this list investigated for publishing copyrighted material. Harold Huber Sheridan, WY Ultimate Research Research Librarian -- Original Message -- Fro
Sorry, I should have included a disclaimer. Please note that the article was being posted only for non-profit educational and research purposes and not to be used for any commercial purpose. That the
HI Harold;the year 1938 for copy rights for railroad age no longer under copy right protection,just books have 70 plus years,50 years for mags,you can find mags from 1958 in google books that state n
I can't find any differentation for magazines in 17 U.S.C. 302 or 305. Please provide a legal citation. Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to
hi; copyright act of 1976;sec 103,this act does not provide copyright protection for any work that goes into the public domain before January 1,1978,also publications had a 28 year protection,whoul
Okay, this is somewhat different. The U.S. has been burdened by a dichotomy inherited from English law treating real and intellectual property in different ways. We're finally getting close to joinin
Hi Norm;i did look up different mags,the copyrights that i found go back to 1948,on railroad age,i found on line 1964,i seems the publishers of magazines did not feel that after 28 years,it was worth
Lots of confusion here. This disclaimer means nothing. Only the copyright owner has the right to grant permission unless it is in the public domain. I doubt that this article is. It is the disseminat