Okay, this is somewhat different. The U.S. has been burdened by a
dichotomy inherited from English law treating real and intellectual
property in different ways. We're finally getting close to joining the
civilized world in this respect. Thieves would love to justify stealing
antiques on the grounds that they're over X number of years old. While
under the law magazines and books have equal protection you're hoping
that the article wasn't renewed and wish to exploit a flaw in the law.
There are two simple solutions: 1) check to see if the article has or
has not been renewed or 2) ask permission.
Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado
kenneth chapin wrote:
> hi; copyright act of 1976;sec 103,this act does not provide copyright
> protection for any work that goes into the public domain before January
> 1,1978,also publications had a 28 year protection,whould have had to been
> renewed ,when that time was up,within one year,97% of publications that
> expired before 1968 have never been renewed,this is stated by the U S
> Copyright Office,thanks ken chapin
>
> --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> From: Norm Metcalf <n.metcalf@worldnet.att.net>
> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Freight Division Article
> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 3:56 PM
>
> I can't find any differentation for magazines in 17 U.S.C.. 302 or 305.
>
> Please provide a legal citation.
>
> Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado
>
>
>
> kenneth chapin wrote:
>
>> HI Harold;the year 1938 for copy rights for railroad age no longer under
>> copy right protection,just books have 70 plus years,50 years for mags,you
>> can find mags from 1958 in google books that state no longer under copy
>> right,thanks ken chapin
>
>
>> --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Harold Huber <sarge9@bresnan. net> wrote:
>
>
>> From: Harold Huber <sarge9@bresnan. net>
>
>> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Freight Division Article
>
>> To: CBQ@yahoogroups. com
>
>> Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 9:22 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>> Folks,
>
>
>> It would be nice to see, but I do not want this list investigated for
>> publishing copyrighted material.
>
>
>> Harold Huber
>
>
>> Sheridan, WY
>
>
>> Ultimate Research
>
>
>> Research Librarian
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>> From: bigbearoak
>
>
>> To: CBQ@yahoogroups. com
>
>
>> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 4:50 PM
>
>
>> Subject: [CBQ] Re: Burlington Freight Division Article
>
>
>
>
>> Amen.
>
>
>
>
>> --- In CBQ@yahoogroups. com, "dsarther" <sartherdj@. ..> wrote:
>
>
>> >
>
>
>> >
>
>
>> > Mark,
>
>
>> >
>
>
>> > Thanks for offering to upload the information for all to see. I'm all in
>> favor of having the opportunity to see it.
>
>
>> >
>
>
>> > Later, Dave S. Tucson, AZ
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|