Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Aurora\s+Grade\s+Separation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Aurora\s+Grade\s+Separation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Aurora Grade Separation (score: 1): Author: "Verne Brummel" <ldb53jmb55@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:45:54 -0600; I remember my Dad telling me about riding his bike in downtown Aurora and watching the construction of the grade separation. He also saw the construction of the new CB&Q Aurora depot. I think this wa; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00169.html (11,789 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Aurora Grade Separation (score: 1): Author: "o_rrman" <mofferman@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:19:50 -0600; Steve, I believe that Joliet did the same thing at around the same time period when Union Station was built, all the railroads had to foot the bill. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00188.html (11,512 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Aurora Grade Separation (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:03:51 -0700 (PDT); Right Mike The same time period you have all the new depot construction on the Q and other needed improvements and all the Railroads were doing the improvements after the struggle to get the lines to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-04/msg00191.html (12,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]