Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RTR\s+vs\s+Kits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RTR\s+vs\s+Kits\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] RTR vs Kits (score: 1): Author: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:57:25 -0500; I'll add my voice to this great discussion, although I think that most of it has been said already... You have to kind of look at the type of operations that are being modeled now as well. If you wer; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00104.html (10,299 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] RTR vs Kits (score: 1): Author: James Becker <jimdandyaussies@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:53:04 -0800 (PST); I think that the surge in RTR versus kits can be blamed on today's lifestyle. 1950's: The "Father Knows Best" era Dad got up at seven and went to the 9 to 5. Came home to dinner. Dispensed advice, he; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00105.html (13,153 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] RTR vs Kits (score: 1): Author: "Myers, Scott V." <svmyers@southernco.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:08:57 -0600; Amen! A lot of truth to this. Scott Myers ________________________________ From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of James Becker Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:53 PM To; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00110.html (16,947 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] RTR vs Kits (score: 1): Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:48:20 -0500; I've been in the hobby for 50 yrs. I'm 78. continue to be fascinated by the hobby. I have a kit under construction on my bench most of the time. Didn't get into the hobby to build kits, but I've buil; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00116.html (12,803 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]