Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Oregon\,\s+IL\s+Truss\s+Bridges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Oregon\,\s+IL\s+Truss\s+Bridges\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] RE: Oregon, IL Truss Bridges (score: 1): Author: <drsager2@yahoo.com>; Date: 15 Nov 2013 08:23:34 -0800; Tom, I cannot speak to the accuracy of the Walthers vs. Central Valley designs other than to say Wikipedia is your friend (search for truss bridge). What I can say is that the CV bridge kit offers a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00111.html (14,750 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] RE: Oregon, IL Truss Bridges (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:05:27 -0800; Tom: The truss spans in the bridge at Oregon are Pratt trusses, not Warren trusses. I agree with the original responder to your post that the Central Valley 150' Pratt truss is a good starting point.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00112.html (15,918 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Oregon, IL Truss Bridges (score: 1): Author: "Paul A. Leonard" <paulaleonard08@att.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:06:16 -0600; I have the N-scale version of this on my layout, which includes the west span over the Rock River at Oregon, and I really like it. Here is a photo link: http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/data/500/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00114.html (11,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]