Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Diagrams\/Drawings\s+of\s+Chicago\s+and\s+Aurora\s+Divisions\s+$Was\s+Signal\s+at\s+MP\s+9\.57$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+RE\:\s+Diagrams\/Drawings\s+of\s+Chicago\s+and\s+Aurora\s+Divisions\s+$Was\s+Signal\s+at\s+MP\s+9\.57$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] RE: Diagrams/Drawings of Chicago and Aurora Divisions (Was Signal at MP 9.57) (score: 1): Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:33:37 -0800; Charlie: Regarding your message (and Gerald Edgar's subsequent reply), I have copies of the actual track profiles from Chicago to Aurora that show stationing as well as milepost locations. Some of th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00174.html (13,447 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] RE: Diagrams/Drawings of Chicago and Aurora Divisions (Was Signal at MP 9.57) (score: 1): Author: "cvlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:33:34 -0600; GlenThat would be great! I believe that the grade started maybe 3 feet above the existing level of the IHB tracks which were depressed as low as they dared (there was some discussion about the tracks; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00181.html (14,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]