Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Peoria\s+Interchange\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Peoria\s+Interchange\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CBQ] Peoria Interchange Question (score: 1): Author: Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:29:51 -0600; Excellent point as to location of the derail Bud. I have CB&Q standards for derails as to the minimum distance from the fouling point but no mention of a maximum distance. I assume there were special; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00002.html (13,039 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Peoria Interchange Question (score: 1): Author: "herrick01" <herrick@krausonline.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:02:25 -0600; I understand that the Q interchanged directly with the TP&W at Peoria, especially perishable traffic to be expedited eastward. Since the TP&W had trackage rights on the Q to get through Peoria, and o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00232.html (10,110 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Peoria Interchange Question (score: 1): Author: ralph linroth <wcman8@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:41 -0800 (PST); Hello Bob I worked Peoria Yard for about 1 year in the early 1980's and I was the Union Local Chairman for Peoria Yard from 1979-1989. The BN crews (and Q crews before them) had agreements with the T; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-02/msg00233.html (11,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]