Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Old\s+railroad\s+terminology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Old\s+railroad\s+terminology\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Old railroad terminology (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:45:17 -0800 (PST); To: P. Hedgpeth RE: Yours Int. the 17th My position has been "abolished" and I would chose to "exercise my seniority rights", but there is no one to "displace" and an "extra list has not been establi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00140.html (14,937 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology (score: 1): Author: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:20:15 -0600; Be advised, this does not establish a precedent. On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:45 PM, John D. Mitchell, Jr. wrote: To: P. Hedgpeth RE: Yours Int. the 17th My position has been "abolished" and I would chose t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00141.html (15,360 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:02:25 -0800 (PST); Yes, because it is a matter of managerial discretion. -- On Mon, 12/17/12, archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net> wrote: From: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Old railroad t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00147.html (15,610 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 06:20:36 -0800 (PST); Yes, because it is a matter of managerial discretion. -- On Mon, 12/17/12, archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net> wrote: From: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net> Subject: Re: [CBQ] Old railroad; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00152.html (16,651 bytes)
5. [CBQ] Old Railroad Terminology (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:08:40 -0500 (EST); Pete, Not sure how far you are thinking about going with the old terminology but...........the old griever in me came up with a list of a dozen or more terms related to....... well you know. If you w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00159.html (10,703 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Old Railroad Terminology (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:58:30 -0500 (EST); Leo I'd be glad to get anything and everything you have..Once I get a list made I'll run it by you and some others who are "in the know" regarding said subject matter. Pete Pete, Not sure how far you; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00164.html (12,074 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]