Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology

[STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>]

Or Managerial Leniency
The result of an investigation
Steve in SC

---

From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, December 18, 2012 12:02:36 AM
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology

 

Yes, because it is a matter of managerial discretion.

--- On Mon, 12/17/12, archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net> wrote:

From: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Old railroad terminology
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 17, 2012, 7:20 PM

 

Be advised, this does not establish a precedent.

On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:45 PM, John D. Mitchell, Jr. wrote:

 

To: P. Hedgpeth

RE: Yours Int. the 17th
 My position has been "abolished" and I would chose to "exercise my seniority rights", but there is no one to "displace" and an "extra list has not been established at this point". Therefore I will be "furloughed with right to be recalled". "All concerned", please reply "by wire" as soon as "practicable".

                                          Sincerely,

                                          J.D. Mitchell

CC Messers:

A Hyden

S. Holding

L. Phillips

P. Weibler

 

 

  

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___