Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+New\s+Athearn\s+65\'\s+Gondola\s+\-\s+non\-commercial\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] New Athearn 65' Gondola - non-commercial (score: 1)
Author: "thommack" <thommack@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:32:56 -0600
I knew this was coming from from Athearn from an announcement at the NMRA convention in July. This is the first picture I have seen: http://www.pbase.com/dh30973/image/50563723 Gondola is CB&Q class
/archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00027.html (10,320 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] New Athearn 65' Gondola - non-commercial (score: 1)
Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@cwia.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:00:37 -0800
Tom, Looking in my copy of the 1965 folio book the GM-3(A-D) is 65'6' inside length with 18 panels the same as the photo in Spoor's Color Guide. There is a GM-8 that is 65'6' inside length with 20 pa
/archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00028.html (11,167 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] New Athearn 65' Gondola - non-commercial (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:56:24 +1300
Tom Just sorting through the old messages and I don't think anyone responded to your query. The GM-3/A/B/C are all on the same page in the diagram book, and the "C's" and "D's" share the same plan nu
/archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00081.html (11,085 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] New Athearn 65' Gondola - non-commercial (score: 1)
Author: Ben de Vries <ben1.vries@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:31:09 +0100
Ken, So it looks like Athearn is fooling us again by putting the wrong paintscheme on the right car or vice-versa! My question is now if there are any pictures around of these GS-8's and when these w
/archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00171.html (11,917 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu