Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+NYC\s+and\s+PRR\s+Run\-throughs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+NYC\s+and\s+PRR\s+Run\-throughs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR Run-throughs (score: 1): Author: "GLEN HAUG" <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:28:40 -0800; After reading the recent messages on the pooled power spreadsheets, I began reading pages from the Burlington Operating Data Sheets on the NYC and PRR run-throughs. I have a question that I hope some; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00062.html (9,250 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR Run-throughs (score: 1): Author: "East Pass" <EastPass@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:49:26 -0600; Glen, The "QNY" usually ran as a separate train. If there was a "UQP" it must have run for only a short while. They would have run on just about the same schedule as the two 68's. I do recall that Wi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00093.html (13,017 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR Run-throughs (score: 1): Author: "GLEN HAUG" <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:33:46 -0800; Russ: Thanks very much. Glen Haug Glen, The "QNY" usually ran as a separate train. If there was a "UQP" it must have run for only a short while. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-01/msg00112.html (8,647 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] NYC and PRR Run-throughs (score: 1): Author: "Peter S Weber via Groups.Io" <owl_man_2000=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 14:58:15 -0800; -- Peter S. Weber Great Grandson of CB&Q Engineer _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#58876) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00051.html (9,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]