- 1. Re: [CBQ] MU connections. Please explain. (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Brown dbrown02@rochester.rr.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:00:12 -0500
- Standard practice for most lines was that the 27-pin electrical MU jumper was located up above. The various air MU hoses were down below, and were duplicated on each side. You did not have to have
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-02/msg00002.html (13,706 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] MU connections. Please explain. (score: 1)
- Author: "Archie Hayden klinerarch@charter.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:51:08 -0600
- As a somewhat diminutive train man, I would often hook up the hoses between engines for some of the rather rotund engineers who didn't fit in that tight of a space. They told me to remember the acron
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-02/msg00003.html (10,076 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] MU connections. Please explain. (score: 1)
- Author: "Stephen Levine sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 02:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
- Q locomotives had MU connections to either side of the nose and additional MU connections above the anti-climber. What was the purpose of each of these connections? __._,_.___ Posted by: Stephen Levi
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00250.html (11,067 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu