Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Irritating\s+Trend\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Irritating\s+Trend\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Irritating Trend (score: 1): Author: "Paul K." <kozys@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:41:04 -0600; All, I have been noticing more and more lately topics on the group concerning BN and BNSF. In the past, I recall people who did so were reminded there are specific groups existing for those railroads; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00095.html (10,026 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Irritating Trend (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:49:34 -0800 (PST); __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00096.html (11,480 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Irritating Trend (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:34:29 -0500; Paul & others, This is one of those gray areas…I feel that it is OK to have posts of a BN/BNSF nature as long as they are updates regarding ex-CB&Q trackage, equipment or facilities. If I deem; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00101.html (15,297 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]