Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+HO\s+Brass\s+\-\-\s+P5\s+and\s+R5\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+HO\s+Brass\s+\-\-\s+P5\s+and\s+R5\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] HO Brass -- P5 and R5 (score: 1): Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:17:05 -0500; There are two icons missing from my collection -- both with pure "Burlington" personalities --the R5 and the P5. These boxy, unpretentious old locomotives were so uniquely Burlington that no CB&Q col; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00077.html (10,560 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] HO Brass -- P5 and R5 (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth Middleton" <krmiddle@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:57:40 -0500; I checked the most recent version that I have (2009) of Dan Glasure's Brass Model Trains Price & Data Guide, and it doen't list either of these in either HO scale or O scale. I would have to guess th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00079.html (13,279 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] HO Brass -- P5 and R5 (score: 1): Author: "Dale Reeves" <drale99@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:40:16 -0500; Thank you, Ken. I was aware of the R1 when it came out. Unfortunately, it was a far cry from the R5 and not really of interest to me. I think you're right. These engines were never produced except by; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00080.html (12,476 bytes)
4. RE: [CBQ] HO Brass -- P5 and R5 (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:41:39 -0600; I don’t believe either has been made in brass in any scale. I do have a vague inkling of a one-off pilot model of a CB&Q engine being made for PFM but don’t remember if was an R5 or what&; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00101.html (12,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]