Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+GP40\s+Numbering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+GP40\s+Numbering\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "bdurham260@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 09 Jan 2016 15:10:13 -0800; Is there any difference between the two different number series of GP40's? Was the any difference in paint schemes? Am I correct only one of these units got the pre merger scheme? Thank you, Brian Du; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00044.html (12,346 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "RWA325@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:59:42 -0500; Brian, Re this link, the difference was Phase Ia3 and Phase IIa3: http://www.trainweb.org/jaydeet/gp40.htm Bob Arthur Princeton, NC In a message dated 1/9/2016 6:10:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, CBQ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00045.html (13,418 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "bdurham260@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 10 Jan 2016 07:12:34 -0800; __._,_.___ Posted by: bdurham260@yahoo.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00047.html (14,430 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "RWA325@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:50:45 -0500; Hopefully we have a numbering guru who can make it all clear. Bob Arthur In a message dated 1/10/2016 10:12:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes: Great info Bob! My quick review; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00048.html (14,996 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:14:32 +0000; The jump to the 620 series was, as Brian notes, simply because there were not enough available numbers in the high 100s -- only 190-199. And since FW&D switchers occupied the numbers from 601 through; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00050.html (22,575 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "RWA325@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:56:47 -0500; And now we know -- the rest of the story. Thanks, Hol. Bob A In a message dated 1/10/2016 12:14:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes: The jump to the 620 series was, as Brian not; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00051.html (19,593 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "bdurham260@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 10 Jan 2016 12:48:23 -0800; Thank you Hol! Brian __._,_.___ Posted by: bdurham260@yahoo.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00052.html (12,584 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "jeff worones jworones@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC); The jump to the 620 series was, as Brian notes, simply because there were not enough available numbers in the high 100s -- only 190-199. And since FW&D switchers occupied the numbers from 601 throug; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00053.html (21,790 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:41:11 +0000; Jeff: That's the only reason I have been able to think of, even though the switchers were 100% owned by the C&S and simply bore Join Line lettering. But the presence of AT&SF reporting marks along wi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00054.html (30,534 bytes)
10. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "'Rodney D. Bennett' tx_ok_rr@hughes.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:07:14 -0600; Another possible reason is that the switchers (603, 605-610) were setup for MU control and could be used on the road as lead units. Rodney Bennett on the old FW&D From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com mailto:CBQ; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00056.html (27,087 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "qrailroadman@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 24 Jan 2016 09:39:45 -0800; Besides having different end plates it was my understanding that the 100's and 600's were equipped with different gear ratios. I may nave it backwards but I thought the 600's had 60:17 gears. Bill Ba; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00164.html (13,075 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] GP40 Numbering (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:32:28 +0000; A check of the Q diesel diagram book shows that all the GP40s -- 170-189 and 620-639 -- had the same 60:17 gearing. Because the 600s weighed 1,613 pounds more than the earlier units (274,813 pounds v; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-01/msg00181.html (16,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]