Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+FW\:\s+RPO\s+structural\s+requirements\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+FW\:\s+RPO\s+structural\s+requirements\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] FW: RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:48:36 +1200; Some information obtained by Philip Weibler on the RPO truss rod question Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ The "Steel Car Act" that was part of a 1913 Post Office Department appropriations bill stated that; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00038.html (17,800 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] FW: RPO structural requirements (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:18:10 -0500; Rupert, that was what was meant as part of the sentence: " The buffing static load ranged from 50,000 to 400,000 pounds depending upon the total weight of empty train (pounds). " Basically, the requi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-06/msg00042.html (14,673 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]