Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+FT\s+antenna\s+conversion\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+FT\s+antenna\s+conversion\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] FT antenna conversion? (score: 1): Author: "Lyle Dowell" <l_dowell1117@att.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:03:48 -0800; Did any of the FTs get a conversion to a firecracker antenna or did they keep the wagon-wheel for the duration? I could see some being replaced as a damage repair. It would seem the firecracker was a; /archives/BRHSLIST/2023-02/msg00004.html (9,947 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] FT antenna conversion? (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <npmoyer@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 19:33:29 +0000; Im not sure I understand how a firecracker is a better antenna from a technological view unless you mean mechanical stability and durability. From physics, we know that the larger a resonant antenna; /archives/BRHSLIST/2023-02/msg00005.html (13,665 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]