BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] FT antenna conversion?

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: [CBQ] FT antenna conversion?
From: "Lyle Dowell" <l_dowell1117@att.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:03:48 -0800
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1675537429; bh=mraObJoYmtm0bjeiSHJF9GfB2dxVCMUeAuOxugbhrzw=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=Yfio99db7/uGJ9vq/kUTSS1RML4QU0HhaCFmjCymcMPO/GwwxYakXiJybZoS5rA3mML F0NJ0mEv/FuCYEMu/TbzYTyoQ3mp4IkUVq6ykmlIY4jnSKwZ862hEU6Jpb8Uhsgys+Bjv cvUVJc7NVSGPsZkyheTbT0in8PMNg/MgWIg=
List-help: <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-subscribe: <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ+unsubscribe@groups.io>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
User-agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster
 Did any of the FTs get a conversion to a firecracker antenna or did they keep the wagon-wheel for the duration?  I could see some being replaced as a damage repair. It would seem the firecracker was a better antenna from a technological view and might have been done for that purpose. Thx

Lyle D
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#65006) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>