Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EMD\s+Products\s+Was\:\s+Re\:U23C\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EMD\s+Products\s+Was\:\s+Re\:U23C\'s\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] EMD Products Was: Re:U23C's (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <Ed@pixelspublishing.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 13:50:43 -0500; Jonathan and Others: As Bob Webber so eloquently pointed out, the weak link in the EMD products of the 1950s and 60s was the electrical system. With the introduction of the GP20 and subsequent models; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-05/msg00006.html (9,796 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] EMD Products Was: Re:U23C's (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 15:02:17 -0500; Ed and Others: I would have to saw that the NP decision got them the U23C power. CB&Q management was already being moved and was many of this power decision. The U23C did not get the power change tha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-05/msg00007.html (11,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]