Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EB\s+\&\s+NCL\s+Running\s+Same\s+Schedule\s+Aurora\s+to\s+St\s+Paul\s+1935\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EB\s+\&\s+NCL\s+Running\s+Same\s+Schedule\s+Aurora\s+to\s+St\s+Paul\s+1935\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] EB & NCL Running Same Schedule Aurora to St Paul 1935 (score: 1): Author: Bernie Lyngdal <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:28:16 -0600; More likely one was a second section to the other, dispatcher's option which one lead to parade. They also each had their own train number (same as home road GN or NP). On Saturday, Novemb; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-12/msg00034.html (13,494 bytes)
2. [CBQ] EB & NCL Running Same Schedule Aurora to St Paul 1935 (score: 1): Author: <mytrainstuff@gmail.com>; Date: 30 Nov 2013 12:04:03 -0800; Some weeks ago, I asked how two separate trains could run on the same schedule and not be running as sections. No answer. I've located my 1935 Q schedule which shows the NCL out of Chicago at 10:30 P; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00163.html (11,098 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] EB & NCL Running Same Schedule Aurora to St Paul 1935 (score: 1): Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:26:31 -0800 (PST); Some weeks ago, I asked how two separate trains could run on the same schedule and not be running as sections. No answer. I've located my 1935 Q schedule which shows the NCL out of Chicago at 10:30; /archives/BRHSLIST/2013-11/msg00165.html (13,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]