Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EA\/E\-5\s+Combinations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EA\/E\-5\s+Combinations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:58:22 -0400 (EDT); List, I have seen (and have) lots of pictures of EA shovel nose A units combined with an E-5 B unit circa 1949 - particularly on the Twin Cities route pulling the TCZ. This combination would produce; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00024.html (11,559 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:02:12 -0400 (EDT); Jeez, it' Monday. I meant to say "I know what happened after the EA A units were turned into "boosters" and they were used on such trains as the Empire Builder and North Coast Limited." Rich G. --Ori; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00025.html (13,310 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:31:37 -0500; Rich- The EB units seemed to have been used less (or at least caught on film) than the EAs. Apparently the 600 HP was enough of a difference. I vaguely recall a photo of the two in a lashup; but; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-10/msg00031.html (12,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]