To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations |
From: | rgortowski@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:58:22 -0400 (EDT) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1349711910; bh=Mg2nZC2HODmRYPm0o1wiepiH/K2V7PuYdQI/0DGek+g=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:X-MB-Message-Source:X-MB-Message-Type:X-Mailer:X-Received:Message-Id:x-aol-global-disposition:X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE:X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:x-aol-sid:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=szq0PDce3U8yqyRSFb20DfK84H9Umf6SNN+pu5PyNfCgteuPyPZztgFuya6i3PaEA6kA9p8HAU5RURoQ3f7N226hnFqOT2u5gWF8h4SYO7+1WZkqu5IgD7A7rB5MV9ah |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=qMGpzTKONRMpq+L9N3OClUczScxK1sgYZy9gmdD9lwAed7CiLQIh88WZCeQyenGzeHZEZdEGwcWkWFqYgAjLz9u5cqZ3gSpTZAO/ubo9NfZacEs0sOY6EoPjrq/adPQ2; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
List,
I have seen (and have) lots of pictures of EA shovel nose A units combined with an E-5 B unit circa 1949 - particularly on the Twin Cities route pulling the TCZ. This combination would produce 3800 hp (1800 for the EA-A unit and 2000 for the E-5 B unit.) During the same time period, did the Q run the E-5 A unit with one of the two EA B units? This combination would have provided 3200 hp (200 for the E-5 A and 1200 for the EA B unit.) This should have been more than enough power for the TCZ, yet I don't recall seeing pictures of this combination in the late forties. Perhaps the EA B units were still otherwise assigned? This is a specific question for 1949-1950. I know what happened after the EA B units were turned into "boosters" and they were used on such trains as the Empire Builder and North Coast Limited.
Rich
__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Re: E5 details, Charlie Vlk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations, rgortowski |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: E5 details, Charlie Vlk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] EA/E-5 Combinations, rgortowski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |