Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Dave\s+Lotz\s+\&\s+Yahoo\s+attachments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Dave\s+Lotz\s+\&\s+Yahoo\s+attachments\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: Ray Bedard <tczephyr@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 07:50:21 -0700; Dave, I vote a NO on photo attachments. Too much junk already on emails. I don't mean to imply that the Q Yahoo list has lots of junk, I mean emails in general. Although I really am a supporter of th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00010.html (13,522 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:41:12 -0700 (PDT); I also would like to vote no on attachments. I read a lot of my yahoo email on my Black Jack II during my daily commuter bus commute and and attachments would interfere with my ability to read email; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00011.html (13,623 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:55:05 -0500; I am also against photo attachments; it's easy to post to the files section, or a photo account somewhere else and provide a link (best of all in my opinion since you can just click over rather than; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00012.html (12,192 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <cz17@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:06:06 -0500; I'm with Ray on this. As a for-instance, this week we might have seen river or yard photos of current floods. I don't see how that relates to the Q - but a lot of people will. which is great - as lon; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00013.html (14,439 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: estcbq@aol.com; Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:42:18 -0400; i am with the NO votes already expressed--jim young I'm with Ray on this. As a for-instance, this week we might have seen river or yard photos of current floods. I don't see how that relates to the Q; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00014.html (15,022 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Dave Lotz & Yahoo attachments (score: 1): Author: "Harold Huber" <sarge9@bresnan.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 06:32:31 -0600; I vote no!! Harold Huber Ultimate Research LLC Sheridan, WY [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00019.html (11,049 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]