Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+F\s+units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+CB\&Q\s+F\s+units\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] CB&Q F units (score: 1): Author: "lyon_wonder" <lyon_wonder@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:35:42 -0600; Did CB&Q contribute any F-units to the BN-merger? It seems that the Q wasted no time in getting rid of their F-units. Most of them apparently were used as trade-ins for newer EMD and GE motive power.; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00171.html (9,670 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q F units (score: 1): Author: Joe Jones <havremt2002@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:17:24 -0700 (PDT); I think all the "graybacks" were gone by 1969 when I hired on in Lincoln. After the merger a lot of old NP & GN F units were assigned then assigned to Lincoln. They were in pretty bad shape when we; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00173.html (10,445 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] CB&Q F units (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:43:10 -0500; From what I can determine the Q contributed a single F unit to the BN: F7A #168A, which was out of service on merger day, and traded in on an SD45 order on 9/30/70. It never received its BN number: 7; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00175.html (12,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]