Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Bars\s+vs\s+chains\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Bars\s+vs\s+chains\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Bars vs chains (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:43:21 -0500; Chuck Zeiler is working on several SD locomotives for MS Train simulator and would like to know why the Q chose to have bars installed at the locomotive cross-overs, a place where you would normally; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-10/msg00103.html (9,073 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Bars vs chains (score: 1): Author: "Jim Ogden" <sjogden@att.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:44:40 -0500; I believe this was done to prevent people from walking from one unit to another when it was in motion. If I remember correctly, the MoPac (after 1960) and the Milwaukee were two other roads that want; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-10/msg00104.html (9,270 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Bars vs chains (score: 1): Author: amtrak347@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:17:59 EDT; Jim is correct. After the BN merger in 1970, the bars were removed and chains installed. Bob Campbell [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Make a clea; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-10/msg00107.html (8,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]